It has come to my attention that something despicable has happened here on this site.it involves many, non of which I shall name directly because,even though I think it is wrong, I consider myself above name calling and finger pointing.

This evening it was brought to me, that one user had commissioned WITHOUT permission an elicit image of another, under aged user. This is down right filthy. It was done in an act of "revenge" for a picture made before of theirs. Neither image was made with the owners permission but I have to say one was playfully harmless compared to the other.
The image in question was created by another user here whom I don't knows they put their hard work and effort into such a distasteful act. I will be notifying that person of this if it is not done already.

You may be asking why would I write this out if not to name names, its because I want all of you artists to be careful of who you draw. Make sure you have received permission from the owner of the character before you put them into adult situations in an image. These characters often times represent the user as a reflection of themselves.

Be safe out there young ones!
Jorge Esquivel
Very well put and said.
  • June 15, 2017
  • ·
  • Like
Dareknov, Shekelmaster
Reminds me of when Shadman drew Keemstar's daughter.
  • June 15, 2017
  • ·
  • Like
Pastel Colors
No lewding the loli/shota

Give pats not faps
  • June 15, 2017
  • ·
  • Like
Whisper
don't do art without permisssssionnnnnnssssssss
  • June 15, 2017
  • ·
  • Like
ImBroken (Polar Swirl 彡)
So were they drawing the users character or the actual user? O.o
  • June 15, 2017
  • ·
  • Like
MistyMoon
It was the Character ;3;
  • June 15, 2017
  • ·
  • Like
Mellow ♥
Wait my comment was deleted wut
  • June 15, 2017
  • ·
  • Like
Gleamy
Mm... hate to burst your bubble in any way but this isn't quite as severe as you are claiming.
Granted, it's pretty bad but the younger user in question is legal age in her state, and is also legal age in the state of the person who commissioned the picture.

This is a simple case of two people going t...
  • June 15, 2017
  • ·
  • Like
Mellow ♥
The artist didn't know the character belonged to someone else till it was too late
  • June 15, 2017
  • ·
  • Like
Gleamy
Yeah, I can't be upset with the artist for that.
I always ask beforehand "Do you have their permission to commission this?" more or less. The worst they can do is the awkward response of it being their own character.
I feel sorry for the artist, not the people involved.
  • June 15, 2017
  • ·
  • Like
Dingo Tits
im sorry but a young girl who gave no permission and is underage feels traumatized by this but your pretty much saying "i dont care, attention seeking blah blah"

what the fuck is wrong with you. pull your. head out of your fucking shitty ass for once in you damned life and understand that porn was u...
  • June 15, 2017
  • ·
  • Like
Mellow ♥
W-what...do you...even know who the people involved are to say that?
  • June 15, 2017
  • ·
  • Like
Viali, again
Yes, and he also knows how one felt, which is the difference between Gleamy and him/Sweet.
  • June 15, 2017
  • ·
  • Like
LavanderDawn
Can confirm that they far from liked the attention, if anything they have distanced themself from it.

Also this blog does not name names specifically to avoid putting the two in the spotlight.
  • June 15, 2017
  • ·
  • Like
Viali, again
Sure, it might be legal in the states but federal law is what rules online, age being 18 there. However, even if it wasn't a matter of legality, the overall message is "Artists, please make sure both parties are okay with it." The fact it was 'revenge' and made a party VERY uncomfortable is what mak...
  • June 15, 2017
  • ·
  • Like
Gleamy
It's not exactly federal law that's concerned here, it is international law. Though, the user in question is legal in both locations. I didn't say in any place that it's not illegal, so don't act as though I did.
I am fully aware of the legalities involved.

I just don't feel sorry for either of them. ...
  • June 15, 2017
  • ·
  • Like
Viali, again
Okay, now where in that is the reasoning for "they liked the attention!" and the like? You can not feel sorry for them but also decide to stay quiet and take the PSA at that instead of having to insist things you didn't know and focus on it.
  • June 15, 2017
  • ·
  • Like
Gleamy
If they didn't like the attention, perhaps they would have been more interested in a formal PSA that doesn't mention the drama at all?
Seriously, how disrespectful is it to post a PSA and involve the drama of someone directly involved? Especially if they're as hurt as they claimed?

I just believe this...
  • June 15, 2017
  • ·
  • Like
Viali, again
They didn't ask for a PSA, and given that they and Sweets are pals, Sweets posted it out of concern with the example being exactly that, an example.

Again, that doesn't call for still making assumptions and claiming they liked the attention when you very easily could have not said that, because as mu...
  • June 15, 2017
  • ·
  • Like
ImBroken (Polar Swirl 彡)
You should delete the blog for the bs that is going on in the comments.
  • June 15, 2017
  • ·
  • Like
Mellow ♥
agreed
  • June 15, 2017
  • ·
  • Like
Sweetimum is online.
I shall not delete the blog because some people want to use my PSA to start drama. It's not my fault others want to act disrespectful
  • June 15, 2017
  • ·
  • Like
Sweetimum is online.
Listen @gleamy respectfully, you weren't there. You have no ides what happened you can only assume. I was there I watched as this unfolded and a young child, no matter hiwnmature they try to be, was emotionally out out to the point were they left the internet for the rest of the night.
Now while you ...
  • June 15, 2017
  • ·
  • Like
Gleamy
If someone was hurt by this, you wouldn't have directly mentioned details of the drama. These aren't children you're punishing, so mentioning details of what happened in this blog is rather disrespectful and tasteless, don't you think?

I wasn't posting about it, sure, but I got enough of the story.
If...
  • June 15, 2017
  • ·
  • Like
ImBroken (Polar Swirl 彡)
You missed the point of the blog.
  • June 15, 2017
  • ·
  • Like
Gleamy
No, I got the point.
Though the delivery of it didn't have to include what it did to still get the point across.
  • June 15, 2017
  • ·
  • Like
Viali, again
However, that's not what your initial stance was on.
Your initial comment was that it wasn't as serious as it was and that they liked the attention. Only later did you now pick up "It could've been handled better".
  • June 15, 2017
  • ·
  • Like
Viali, again
"The person did not make it public on phm. They had a panicked reaction in the middle of a private group chat before going offline.

Instead of starting Drama they blocked the other person, reported them and then went offline.


This post from sweets and reactions from people like me and beardy was due t...
  • June 15, 2017
  • ·
  • Like
Viali, again
Blog is now locked - Fair debate is good long as nobody gets *too* heated, but it doesn't seem like it can continue from here without going into a loop or semantics. I'll do some pruning, however most comments will remain up.
  • June 15, 2017
  • ·
  • Like
Captcha Challenge
Reload Image
Type in the verification code above